This can be presented in Max/MSP using the vst~ object and nearly all its parameters can be controlled via Max. I also use the EchoBoy plug-in which works well in Max or Live. I find using Push2 for mix and effects is really efficient. All my effects are on the computer side, either as Live channel devices or on a mix bus. Like I do most of the module sequencing CV from Live using Push. I have MAX/MSP, Ableton Live and a Push2. And while a Lorenz module might make sense (see sloths) you probably wouldn’t build one for a Rossler attractor. A simple triangle LFO Is easily available as a module, so there’s little point in tying up a Max CV that could be putting out a Lorenz attractor. It depends on the complexity and rarity of the curve. Like "oh this is what I want the delay CV to be" and "oh I want to adapt the delay LFO to my filter cutoff" and so on in this fashion building an insane library of customized subpatches.
For example, even with the control Maths/DUSG offers, I usually want to offset or attenuate and I end up changing the curve/times by ear, but in the computer I feel like it would be easier to make subpatches like you're describing specifically for known parameters. Surprising to me because I would think maybe LFO control would be nicer with a computer! (I only use slew based designs in modular because I think they're easier to work with).
(Using a computer to generate a simple ramp voltage is a waste of CV bandwidth.) It includes more LFOs and envelope generators than I had originally planned because Max has no advantage to add there.
0 kommentar(er)
